lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170209155751.GB29882@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:57:51 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] ARM: orion: fix PHYLIB dependency

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly introduced mdiobus_register_board_info() function is only available
> as part of PHYLIB, so we get a link error when we call that from a board while
> phylib is disabled:
> 
> arch/arm/plat-orion/common.o: In function `orion_ge00_switch_init':
> common.c:(.init.text+0x6a4): undefined reference to `mdiobus_register_board_info'
> 
> This adds a workaround that is made up of three parts:
> 
> - in plat-orion, the function for declaring the switch is hidden without
>   PHYLIB.
> - in mach-orion5x, the caller conditionally stubs out the call to
>   the removed function, so we can still build other orion5x boards
>   without PHYLIB
> - For the boards that actually declare the switch, we select PHYLIB
>   explicitly from Kconfig if NETDEVICES is set. Without NETDEVICES,
>   we cannot enable PHYLIB, but we also wouldn't need it.

Hi Arnd

Although all correct, would it not be simpler to just select PHYLIB
and NETDEVICES? These devices are all NAS boxes and WiFi access
points. What sense does it make to build a kernel without working
networking for these classes of devices?

	   Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ