[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPj87rOgzWBUutOwY0_yMHvPAuzJqSQZUSvsAkPtEeGsoGHodw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:38:26 +0000
From: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Stefan Christ <s.christ@...tec.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/fb_helper: implement ioctl FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC
Hi,
On 9 February 2017 at 17:01, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:31:57AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> +int drm_fb_helper_ioctl(struct fb_info *info, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper = info->par;
>> + struct drm_device *dev = fb_helper->dev;
>> + unsigned int i;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>> + if (!drm_fb_helper_is_bound(fb_helper)) {
>> + drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (cmd) {
>> + case FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC:
>> + for (i = 0; i < fb_helper->crtc_count; i++) {
>> + struct drm_mode_set *mode_set;
>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> +
>> + mode_set = &fb_helper->crtc_info[i].mode_set;
>> + crtc = mode_set->crtc;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Only call drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank for crtcs that
>> + * are currently enabled.
>> + */
>> + if (!crtc->enabled)
>> + continue;
>
> This needs locking
More locking than the drm_modeset_lock_all() above the switch? Ouch. :)
Cheers,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists