[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1486699771-8007-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:09:31 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Enhance readability of iterating wake_list
This is just for enhancing readability and a trivial one. Please take
this only if you agree.
-----8<-----
>From bb8cfcaa21ce157fb890a3e878fed2f2b7dadf81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:53:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Enhance readability of iterating wake_list
Code for interating wake_list can be simpler so that it becomes more
readable and can be seen at a glance.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d01f9d0..66e7743 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1769,6 +1769,11 @@ static int ttwu_remote(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#define for_each_wake_list(task, node) \
+ for ((task) = llist_entry((node), struct task_struct, wake_entry); \
+ node; (node) = llist_next(node), \
+ (task) = llist_entry((node), struct task_struct, wake_entry))
+
void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
{
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
@@ -1783,17 +1788,8 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf);
- while (llist) {
- int wake_flags = 0;
-
- p = llist_entry(llist, struct task_struct, wake_entry);
- llist = llist_next(llist);
-
- if (p->sched_remote_wakeup)
- wake_flags = WF_MIGRATED;
-
- ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, &rf);
- }
+ for_each_wake_list(p, llist)
+ ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, p->sched_remote_wakeup ? WF_MIGRATED : 0, &rf);
rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists