[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170209.225715.34351834998363822.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:57:15 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ebiggers3@...il.com
Cc: 4sschmid@...ormatik.uni-hamburg.de, minchan@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bongkyu.kim@....com,
rsalvaterra@...il.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com, keescook@...omium.org,
tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Update LZ4 compressor module
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:29:14 -0800
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:02:11PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>> >
>> > [Also, for some reason linux-crypto is apparently still not receiving patch 1/5
>> > in the series. It's missing from the linux-crypto archive at
>> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/, so it's not just me.]
>> >
>>
>> I don't really know what to do about this. I think the matter is the size of the E-Mail.
>> Are there filters or something like that? Since in linux-kernel the patch seems to get delivered.
>> I could otherwise CC you if you wish.
>>
>
> If I'm not mistaken, David Miller is the admin of the mail server on
> vger.kernel.org, and he already happens to be Cc'ed on this thread, so maybe he
> can answer as to why linux-crypto may be configured differently?
>
> Anyway, since the patch did make it to linux-kernel anyone can still download it
> from patchwork if they know where to look:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9556271/
I've increased the maxlength parameter for linux-cryto so this doesn't
happen again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists