Message-ID: <845d420f-dd26-fb48-c8ef-10ca1995daf8@sonymobile.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:21:32 +0100
From:   peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 staging-next] android: Collect statistics from
 lowmemorykiller

Im not speaking for google, but I think there is a work ongoing to
replace this with user-space code. Until then we have to polish
this version as good as we can. It is essential for android as it is now.

On 02/09/2017 09:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 09-02-17 21:07:37, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:26:41PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 09-02-17 14:21:45, peter enderborg wrote:
>>>> This collects stats for shrinker calls and how much
>>>> waste work we do within the lowmemorykiller.
>>> This doesn't explain why do we need this information and who is going to
>>> use it. Not to mention it exports it in /proc which is considered a
>>> stable user API. This is a no-go, especially for something that is still
>>> lingering in the staging tree without any actuall effort to make it
>>> fully supported MM feature. I am actually strongly inclined to simply
>>> drop lmk from the tree completely.
>> I thought that someone was working to get the "native" mm features to
>> work properly with the lmk "feature"  Do you recall if that work got
>> rejected, or just never happened?
> Never happened AFAIR. There were some attempts to tune the current
> behavior which has been rejected for one reason or another but I am not
> really aware of anybody working on moving the code from staging area.
>
> I already have this in the to-send queue, just didn't get to post it yet
> because I planned to polish the reasoning some more.
> ---
> From 9f871b54a387e0a7cdfaf0fa256d1440093e427c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:37:30 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] staging, android: remove lowmemory killer from the tree
>
> Lowmemory killer is sitting in the staging tree since 2008 without any
> serious interest for fixing issues brought up by the MM folks. The main
> objection is that the implementation is basically broken by design:
> 	- it hooks into slab shrinker API which is not suitable for this
> 	  purpose. lowmem_count implementation just shows this nicely.
> 	  There is no scaling based on the memory pressure and no
> 	  feedback to the generic shrinker infrastructure.
> 	- it is not reclaim context aware - no NUMA and/or memcg
> 	  awareness.
>
> As the code stands right now it just adds a maintenance overhead when
> core MM changes have to update lowmemorykiller.c as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/android/Kconfig           |  10 --
>  drivers/staging/android/Makefile          |   1 -
>  drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 212 ------------------------------
>  include/linux/sched.h                     |   4 -
>  4 files changed, 227 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig
> index 6c00d6f765c6..71a50b99caff 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig
> @@ -14,16 +14,6 @@ config ASHMEM
>  	  It is, in theory, a good memory allocator for low-memory devices,
>  	  because it can discard shared memory units when under memory pressure.
>  
> -config ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER
> -	bool "Android Low Memory Killer"
> -	---help---
> -	  Registers processes to be killed when low memory conditions, this is useful
> -	  as there is no particular swap space on android.
> -
> -	  The registered process will kill according to the priorities in android init
> -	  scripts (/init.rc), and it defines priority values with minimum free memory size
> -	  for each priority.
> -
>  source "drivers/staging/android/ion/Kconfig"
>  
>  endif # if ANDROID
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/Makefile b/drivers/staging/android/Makefile
> index 7ed1be798909..7cf1564a49a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/Makefile
> @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ ccflags-y += -I$(src)			# needed for trace events
>  obj-y					+= ion/
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ASHMEM)			+= ashmem.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER)	+= lowmemorykiller.o
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index ec3b66561412..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,212 +0,0 @@
> -/* drivers/misc/lowmemorykiller.c
> - *
> - * The lowmemorykiller driver lets user-space specify a set of memory thresholds
> - * where processes with a range of oom_score_adj values will get killed. Specify
> - * the minimum oom_score_adj values in
> - * /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/adj and the number of free pages in
> - * /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree. Both files take a comma
> - * separated list of numbers in ascending order.
> - *
> - * For example, write "0,8" to /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/adj and
> - * "1024,4096" to /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree to kill
> - * processes with a oom_score_adj value of 8 or higher when the free memory
> - * drops below 4096 pages and kill processes with a oom_score_adj value of 0 or
> - * higher when the free memory drops below 1024 pages.
> - *
> - * The driver considers memory used for caches to be free, but if a large
> - * percentage of the cached memory is locked this can be very inaccurate
> - * and processes may not get killed until the normal oom killer is triggered.
> - *
> - * Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Google, Inc.
> - *
> - * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> - * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
> - * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> - *
> - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> - * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> - * GNU General Public License for more details.
> - *
> - */
> -
> -#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> -
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/oom.h>
> -#include <linux/sched.h>
> -#include <linux/swap.h>
> -#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> -#include <linux/profile.h>
> -#include <linux/notifier.h>
> -
> -static u32 lowmem_debug_level = 1;
> -static short lowmem_adj[6] = {
> -	0,
> -	1,
> -	6,
> -	12,
> -};
> -
> -static int lowmem_adj_size = 4;
> -static int lowmem_minfree[6] = {
> -	3 * 512,	/* 6MB */
> -	2 * 1024,	/* 8MB */
> -	4 * 1024,	/* 16MB */
> -	16 * 1024,	/* 64MB */
> -};
> -
> -static int lowmem_minfree_size = 4;
> -
> -static unsigned long lowmem_deathpending_timeout;
> -
> -#define lowmem_print(level, x...)			\
> -	do {						\
> -		if (lowmem_debug_level >= (level))	\
> -			pr_info(x);			\
> -	} while (0)
> -
> -static unsigned long lowmem_count(struct shrinker *s,
> -				  struct shrink_control *sc)
> -{
> -	return global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
> -		global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> -		global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON) +
> -		global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> -}
> -
> -static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
> -{
> -	struct task_struct *tsk;
> -	struct task_struct *selected = NULL;
> -	unsigned long rem = 0;
> -	int tasksize;
> -	int i;
> -	short min_score_adj = OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX + 1;
> -	int minfree = 0;
> -	int selected_tasksize = 0;
> -	short selected_oom_score_adj;
> -	int array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lowmem_adj);
> -	int other_free = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) - totalreserve_pages;
> -	int other_file = global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES) -
> -				global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) -
> -				total_swapcache_pages();
> -
> -	if (lowmem_adj_size < array_size)
> -		array_size = lowmem_adj_size;
> -	if (lowmem_minfree_size < array_size)
> -		array_size = lowmem_minfree_size;
> -	for (i = 0; i < array_size; i++) {
> -		minfree = lowmem_minfree[i];
> -		if (other_free < minfree && other_file < minfree) {
> -			min_score_adj = lowmem_adj[i];
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	lowmem_print(3, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, ofree %d %d, ma %hd\n",
> -		     sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask, other_free,
> -		     other_file, min_score_adj);
> -
> -	if (min_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX + 1) {
> -		lowmem_print(5, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, return 0\n",
> -			     sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	selected_oom_score_adj = min_score_adj;
> -
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	for_each_process(tsk) {
> -		struct task_struct *p;
> -		short oom_score_adj;
> -
> -		if (tsk->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		p = find_lock_task_mm(tsk);
> -		if (!p)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (task_lmk_waiting(p) &&
> -		    time_before_eq(jiffies, lowmem_deathpending_timeout)) {
> -			task_unlock(p);
> -			rcu_read_unlock();
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -		oom_score_adj = p->signal->oom_score_adj;
> -		if (oom_score_adj < min_score_adj) {
> -			task_unlock(p);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		tasksize = get_mm_rss(p->mm);
> -		task_unlock(p);
> -		if (tasksize <= 0)
> -			continue;
> -		if (selected) {
> -			if (oom_score_adj < selected_oom_score_adj)
> -				continue;
> -			if (oom_score_adj == selected_oom_score_adj &&
> -			    tasksize <= selected_tasksize)
> -				continue;
> -		}
> -		selected = p;
> -		selected_tasksize = tasksize;
> -		selected_oom_score_adj = oom_score_adj;
> -		lowmem_print(2, "select '%s' (%d), adj %hd, size %d, to kill\n",
> -			     p->comm, p->pid, oom_score_adj, tasksize);
> -	}
> -	if (selected) {
> -		task_lock(selected);
> -		send_sig(SIGKILL, selected, 0);
> -		if (selected->mm)
> -			task_set_lmk_waiting(selected);
> -		task_unlock(selected);
> -		lowmem_print(1, "Killing '%s' (%d), adj %hd,\n"
> -				 "   to free %ldkB on behalf of '%s' (%d) because\n"
> -				 "   cache %ldkB is below limit %ldkB for oom_score_adj %hd\n"
> -				 "   Free memory is %ldkB above reserved\n",
> -			     selected->comm, selected->pid,
> -			     selected_oom_score_adj,
> -			     selected_tasksize * (long)(PAGE_SIZE / 1024),
> -			     current->comm, current->pid,
> -			     other_file * (long)(PAGE_SIZE / 1024),
> -			     minfree * (long)(PAGE_SIZE / 1024),
> -			     min_score_adj,
> -			     other_free * (long)(PAGE_SIZE / 1024));
> -		lowmem_deathpending_timeout = jiffies + HZ;
> -		rem += selected_tasksize;
> -	}
> -
> -	lowmem_print(4, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, return %lu\n",
> -		     sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask, rem);
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	return rem;
> -}
> -
> -static struct shrinker lowmem_shrinker = {
> -	.scan_objects = lowmem_scan,
> -	.count_objects = lowmem_count,
> -	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS * 16
> -};
> -
> -static int __init lowmem_init(void)
> -{
> -	register_shrinker(&lowmem_shrinker);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -device_initcall(lowmem_init);
> -
> -/*
> - * not really modular, but the easiest way to keep compat with existing
> - * bootargs behaviour is to continue using module_param here.
> - */
> -module_param_named(cost, lowmem_shrinker.seeks, int, 0644);
> -module_param_array_named(adj, lowmem_adj, short, &lowmem_adj_size, 0644);
> -module_param_array_named(minfree, lowmem_minfree, uint, &lowmem_minfree_size,
> -			 0644);
> -module_param_named(debug_level, lowmem_debug_level, uint, 0644);
> -
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index e93594b88130..3cc6c650fa6a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2347,7 +2347,6 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags)
>  #define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0	/* May not gain new privileges. */
>  #define PFA_SPREAD_PAGE  1      /* Spread page cache over cpuset */
>  #define PFA_SPREAD_SLAB  2      /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
> -#define PFA_LMK_WAITING  3      /* Lowmemorykiller is waiting */
>  
>  
>  #define TASK_PFA_TEST(name, func)					\
> @@ -2371,9 +2370,6 @@ TASK_PFA_TEST(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
>  TASK_PFA_SET(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
>  TASK_PFA_CLEAR(SPREAD_SLAB, spread_slab)
>  
> -TASK_PFA_TEST(LMK_WAITING, lmk_waiting)
> -TASK_PFA_SET(LMK_WAITING, lmk_waiting)
> -
>  /*
>   * task->jobctl flags
>   */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists