[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702101405570.4036@nanos>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:07:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
cc: Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/9] x86/arch_prctl Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID for
controlling the CPUID instruction
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Kyle Huey wrote:
> rr (http://rr-project.org/), a userspace record-and-replay reverse-
> execution debugger, would like to trap and emulate the CPUID instruction.
> This would allow us to a) mask away certain hardware features that rr does
> not support (e.g. RDRAND) and b) enable trace portability across machines
> by providing constant results.
>
> Newer Intel CPUs (Ivy Bridge and later) can fault when CPUID is executed at
> CPL > 0. Expose this capability to userspace as a new pair of arch_prctls,
> ARCH_GET_CPUID and ARCH_SET_CPUID.
>
> Since v13:
> All: rebased on top of tglx's __switch_to_xtra patches
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/15/432)
That doesn't help because that patchset is stale and it has unresolved
comments. I don't know when I have cycles to revisit it, but if you want to
have a try feel free to do so.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists