[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170210143122.GC18321@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:31:22 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: ming.lei@...onical.com, bp@...en8.de, wagi@...om.org, teg@...m.no,
mchehab@....samsung.com, zajec5@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, markivx@...eaurora.org,
stephen.boyd@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tiwai@...e.de, johannes@...solutions.net,
chunkeey@...glemail.com, hauke@...ke-m.de,
jwboyer@...oraproject.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org, jslaby@...e.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...capital.net,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
j.anaszewski@...sung.com, Abhay_Salunke@...l.com,
Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, Gilles.Muller@...6.fr, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
dhowells@...hat.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] firmware: add driver data API
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:08:52PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Greg,
>
> This v5 drops the driver porting examples in light of the fact simple
> cases do not yet benefit from use of the newer API. The API is purposely
> introduced bare bones so new features are easier to review.
I am not going to review this until you actually convert some existing
code, or do something with it. A test-module isn't proof that this is a
good api or not. As it is, I can't add new apis with no users.
sorry,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists