[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170210154614.GB16097@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:46:14 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>, lvenanci@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET for-4.11] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread mode
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:07:16AM -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> What are the motivations that you see for forcing this all onto one
> mount-point via .threads sub-tree tags?
So, you wanted rgroup but with /proc interface? I'm afraid it's too
late for that.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists