[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37b11e67-7ed7-244d-b27e-ec3bb7732b0e@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:37:44 -0300
From: Thibault Saunier <thibault.saunier@....samsung.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] [media] exynos-gsc: Use 576p instead 720p as a
threshold for colorspaces
On 02/10/2017 12:07 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 02/10/2017 03:10 PM, Thibault Saunier wrote:
>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>>
>> The media documentation says that the V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M colorspace
>> should be used for SDTV and V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709 for HDTV. But drivers
>> don't agree on the display resolution that should be used as a threshold.
>>
>> Some drivers set V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709 for 720p and higher while others
>> set V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709 for anything higher than 576p. Newers drivers
>> use the latter and that also matches what user-space multimedia programs
>> do (i.e: GStreamer), so change the driver logic to be aligned with this.
>>
>> Also, check for the resolution in G_FMT instead unconditionally setting
>> the V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709 colorspace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thibault Saunier <thibault.saunier@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Do not check values in the g_fmt functions as Andrzej explained in previous review
>> - Added 'Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>'
>>
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>> drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
>> index 59a634201830..db7d9883861b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
>> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ int gsc_try_fmt_mplane(struct gsc_ctx *ctx, struct v4l2_format *f)
>>
>> pix_mp->num_planes = fmt->num_planes;
>>
>> - if (pix_mp->width >= 1280) /* HD */
>> + if (pix_mp->width > 720 && pix_mp->height > 576) /* HD */
>> pix_mp->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709;
>> else /* SD */
>> pix_mp->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M;
>> @@ -519,9 +519,13 @@ int gsc_g_fmt_mplane(struct gsc_ctx *ctx, struct v4l2_format *f)
>> pix_mp->height = frame->f_height;
>> pix_mp->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
>> pix_mp->pixelformat = frame->fmt->pixelformat;
>> - pix_mp->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709;
>> pix_mp->num_planes = frame->fmt->num_planes;
>>
>> + if (pix_mp->width > 720 && pix_mp->height > 576) /* HD */
>> + pix_mp->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_REC709;
>> + else /* SD */
>> + pix_mp->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M;
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < pix_mp->num_planes; ++i) {
>> pix_mp->plane_fmt[i].bytesperline = (frame->f_width *
>> frame->fmt->depth[i]) / 8;
>>
> This is a mem2mem device, right? In the case of mem2mem devices the driver should never
> set the colorspace, instead it just copies it from what the application provides (the
> video output side) to the capture side.
>
> After all, you are just scaling here so the input and output colorspaces are
> exactly the same, and the scaler doesn't care what the colorspace is.
This device also does color conversion so I think it matters here, am I
misunderstanding something?
Also, is that comment only for the try_fmt part as it looks like in
g_fmt the driver should fill up the structure
with its values?
Thanks for you review.
Regards,
Thibault Saunier
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists