[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170210222501.7948-3-tony@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:25:01 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PM / wakeirq: Fix spurious wake-up events for dedicated wakeirqs
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Dedicated wakeirq is a one time event to wake-up the system from
low-power state and then call pm_runtime_resume() on the device wired
with the dedicated wakeirq.
Sometimes dedicated wakeirqs can get deferred if they trigger after we
call disable_irq_nosync() in dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(). This can happen
if pm_runtime_get() is called around the same time a wakeirq fires.
If an interrupt fires after disable_irq_nosync(), by default it will get
tagged with IRQS_PENDING and will run later on when the interrupt is
enabled again.
Deferred wakeirqs usually just produce pointless wake-up events. But they
can also cause suspend to fail if the deferred wakeirq fires during
dpm_suspend_noirq() for example. So we really don't want to see the
deferred wakeirqs triggering after the device has resumed.
Let's fix the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the dedicated
wakeirqs. The other option would be to implement irq_disable() in the
dedicated wakeirq controller, but that's not a generic solution.
For reference below is what happens with a IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH IRQ
type wakeirq:
- resume by dedicated IRQ (EDGE_FALLING)
- suspend_enter()
....
- arch_suspend_enable_irqs()
|- dedicated IRQ armed and fired
|- irq_pm_check_wakeup()
|- disarm, disable IRQ and mark as IRQS_PENDING
....
- dpm_resume_noirq()
|- resume_device_irqs()
|- __enable_irq()
|- check_irq_resend()
|- handle_threaded_wake_irq()
|- dedicated IRQ processed
|- device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs()
|- disable_irq_wake()
....
!-> dedicated IRQ (EDGE_RISING)
-| handle_edge_irq()
|- IRQ disabled: mask_ack_irq and mark as IRQS_PENDING
....
- subsequent suspend
....
|- dpm_suspend_noirq()
|- device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs()
|- __enable_irq()
|- check_irq_resend()
(a) |- handle_threaded_wake_irq()
|- pm_wakeup_event() --> abort suspend
....
|- suspend_device_irqs()
|- suspend_device_irq()
|- dedicated IRQ armed
....
(b) |- resend_irqs
|- irq_pm_check_wakeup()
|- IRQ armed -> abort suspend
because of pending IRQ System suspend can be aborted at points
(a)-not armed or (b)-armed.
Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ
handling")
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
[tony@...mide.com: added a comment, updated the description]
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
---
drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
wirq->irq = irq;
irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
+ /* Prevent deferred spurious wakeirqs with disable_irq_nosync() */
+ irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
+
/*
* Consumer device may need to power up and restore state
* so we use a threaded irq.
--
2.11.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists