linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:35:35 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Ken Lin <ken.lin@...antech.com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 4.10 set 3 - a couple of regression fixes.

> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> The following changes since commit 5c113b5e0082e90d2e1c7b12e96a7b8cf0623e27:
>> 
>>   iio: dht11: Use usleep_range instead of msleep for start signal (2017-01-22 13:35:40 +0000)
>> 
>> are available in the git repository at:
>> 
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-4.10c
> 
> It's a bit late for 4.10 for me, can I just pull this into my -next
> branch and will they get to 4.10.1 properly?  Meaning, do that have cc:
> stable markings on them?  Or do you want to fix that up and resend this
> request?

Hi Greg,

You should ask Ken Lin who has the HW and who is apparently affected.
I think it's bad that you are willing to have a known regression hit
v4.10 when all was fine in v4.9. Or perhaps you didn't realize that
the regression was from this cycle?

The fixes are obvious. I don't understand your hesitation.

Cheers,
peda