linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two wakeirq fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170210223737.GF21809@atomide.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:37:37 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two wakeirq fixes

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> [170210 14:35]:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here are two wakeirq fixes from Grygorii that have been pending for
> > a while.
> >
> > Earlier before commit bed570307ed7 ("PM / wakeirq: Fix dedicated
> > wakeirq for drivers not using autosuspend") I did not see changes
> > with my test cases with these two changes, but now I have test cases
> > that get fixed with these two patches.
> 
> OK, I'll queue them up.
> 
> If a new merge window starts on Sunday, however, they will not make it
> to my first pull request.  I'll push them in the second half of the
> merge window in that case.

OK thanks that's fine.

Regards,

Tony