[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6bc74a2-9899-5f33-f04e-66da6209daf9@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:23:27 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] iio: Add parent_trigger attribute to triggers
On 06/02/17 14:43, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> 2017-02-06 15:26 GMT+01:00 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>:
>> On 02/06/2017 03:21 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>> Thoses patches add parent_trigger attribute to IIO triggers.
>>> The goal is to allow triggers to use triggers like is this done for iio
>>> devices.
>>> With this patch it will be possible to chain triggers, for example
>>> stm32 triggers could be used as clock of an other triggers:
>>> echo "tim1_trgo" > trigger0/parent_trigger.
>>
>> Can you explain how this is different to assigning the parent_trigger
>> directly to the device?
>>
>
> It is the same but done on trigger structure without need to have an iio device.
>
> While writing stm32 trigger driver Jonathan explain me that I can't use an iio
> device without channel to chain my hardware blocks.
> Since my hardware allows to chain triggers, Jonathan suggest to create this
> parent_trigger attribute to ab able to link the triggers.
>
I think Lars was looking for the more general explanation. How does
one trigger drive another one? What does that mean?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists