linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/60] staging: lustre: llite: check request != NULL in ll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1702111709001.12301@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 11 Feb 2017 17:12:22 +0000 (GMT)
From:   James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        wang di <di.wang@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/60] staging: lustre: llite: check request != NULL in
 ll_migrate


> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:04:33PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> > From: wang di <di.wang@...el.com>
> > 
> > Check if the request is NULL, before retrieve reply body
> > from the request.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: wang di <di.wang@...el.com>
> > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7396
> > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/17079
> > Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
> > index a1e51a5..b681e15 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
> > @@ -2656,28 +2656,33 @@ int ll_migrate(struct inode *parent, struct file *file, int mdtidx,
> >  	if (!rc)
> >  		ll_update_times(request, parent);
> >  
> 
> I don't like how we return a non-NULL request on many error paths.  It
> would be simpler to understand if mdc_rename() freed request on error.
> So mdc_reint() fails but we still continue?  I don't understand that but
> there are no comments about it.
> 
> 
> > -	body = req_capsule_server_get(&request->rq_pill, &RMF_MDT_BODY);
> > -	if (!body) {
> > -		rc = -EPROTO;
> > -		goto out_free;
> > -	}
> > +	if (request) {
> > +		body = req_capsule_server_get(&request->rq_pill, &RMF_MDT_BODY);
> > +		if (!body) {
> > +			rc = -EPROTO;
> > +			goto out_free;
> 
> We should call ptlrpc_req_finished(request) before returning on this
> path.

Their are more patches coming that fix the issues you pointed out. Its 
just I have been pushing patches that are order independent first. I
will push out the patches to address other issues with ll_migrate().