lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:32:45 -0800
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regulator: Add driver for voltage controlled
 regulators

El Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:43:48PM -0800 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit:

> The output voltage of a voltage controlled regulator can be controlled
> through the voltage of another regulator. The current version of this
> driver assumes that the output voltage is a linear function of the control
> voltage.
> 
> ...
>
> +static int vctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> ...
> +	/* determine if the voltage range of the control supply is continuous */
> +	if ((regulator_count_voltages(vctrl->ctrl_supply) == 1) &&
> +	    regulator_is_supported_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_supply,
> +					   vrange_ctrl->min_uV,
> +					   vrange_ctrl->min_uV) &&
> +	    regulator_is_supported_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_supply,
> +					   vrange_ctrl->max_uV,
> +					   vrange_ctrl->max_uV)) {
> +		rdesc->continuous_voltage_range = true;
> +		rdesc->ops = &vctrl_ops_cont;
> +	} else {
> +		rdesc->ops = &vctrl_ops_non_cont;
> +	}

This creature of indisputable beauty seemed to do the job on my
test systen, however I just realized that the condition is BS. It
turns out that on my system the voltage count of 1 stems from the
parent, since the voltage count of the control supply itself is zero.

int regulator_count_voltages(struct regulator *regulator)
{
	struct regulator_dev    *rdev = regulator->rdev;

	if (rdev->desc->n_voltages)
		return rdev->desc->n_voltages;

	if (!rdev->supply)
		return -EINVAL;

	return regulator_count_voltages(rdev->supply);
}

This certainly doesn't help to determine if the regulator has a
continous voltage range. It seems we need a function that evaluates
rdesc->continuous_voltage_range

--

Matthias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ