[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20170211044434.ujkayqmfg52rvw32@gangnam.samsung>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:44:34 +0900
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: Enable ir-spi in the tm2 and tm2e boards
Hi Javier,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:04:50AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 11:22 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
...
> > + irda_regulator: irda-regulator {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpr3 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + regulator-name = "irda_regulator";
>
> How is this regulator named in the board schematics? My
> understanding is that regulator-name should match this.
>
> I don't have access to this so it may be "irda_regulator"
> although I was expecting something more like "VDD_IRDA".
This is not a real regulator.
This is an external regulator which is enabled with a gpio
(GPR3[3]). The regulator-fixed allows me to use the regulator API
even though I would only need to control a gpio (with the gpio
API). I prefer using regulator to keep the same interface no
matter how the irda is connected.
About the name, I have full freedom to chose as of course it's
not documented in the exynos5433 datasheet. Perhaps I could call
it irda-gpio-regulator to make it more clear?
> Patch looks good to me though:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists