linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/20] staging: rtl8192u: Prefer using the BIT macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170212221821.GA20773@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:18:21 -0800
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/20] staging: rtl8192u: Prefer using the BIT macro

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:26:37AM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> Fix the checkpatch.pl issue:
> CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro replacing
> bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 140 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

Didn't you send this before?  If so, this should be a v2 patch, right?
And if so, please always say _what_ changed between versions, see
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to properly label this.

thanks,

greg k-h