lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee50aa90-a37c-6661-3d0d-a2c0e4d135ae@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2017 23:21:13 +0100
From:   Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Ruslan Ruslichenko <rruslich@...co.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.9.6 ( Restore IO-APIC irq_chip retrigger callback ,
 breaks my box )



On 12.02.2017 22:12, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 09:21:53PM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>> There is what I get :
>>
>> http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/crazy/kernel/t/crash2.mp4
>
> Ok, I'm watching it frame-by-frame. I can see the microcode getting
> updated to revision 0x19 as in your working dmesg.
>
> The machine hangs here at the
>
> clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x20ac7f6ecc6, max_idle_ns: 440795315461 ns
>
> line too. The exact same numbers even as in the previous run! Strange.
>
>> With dis_ucode_ldr there is some more output , with it will stay like this , nothing more.
>
> Ok, can you do redo the first video but with "initcall_debug" on the
> kernel command line?
>
> And then do video of another run with "initcall_debug dis_ucode_ldr" on
> the kernel command line?
>
> I'd like to see which of the initcalls doesn't return.

There are both videos .. however the output seems kind same this time..

http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/crazy/kernel/t/crash_initcall_debug.mp4
http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/other/people/crazy/kernel/t/crash_intcall_debug_ucode_off.mp4

I try to find out more tomorrow but right now I don't even have a clue
where to add some printk's to get some more output :(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ