[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR03MB2490408F8D00159EDF5A9871A0460@DM5PR03MB2490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 05:55:26 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"leann.ogasawara@...onical.com" <leann.ogasawara@...onical.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 8:39 AM
> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org;
> olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com; vkuznets@...hat.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com; leann.ogasawara@...onical.com; Stephen
> Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 6:47 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org;
> olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com; vkuznets@...hat.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com; leann.ogasawara@...onical.com; Stephen
> Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state
>
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 05:20:35PM -0700, kys@...hange.microsoft.com
> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> >
> > The netvsc no longer needs per channel state hook to track receive buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/hyperv.h | 14 --------------
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> This patch breaks the build badly, I don't know how it passed anyone's
> build tests :(
>
> The functions are still used in two different files.
>
> I've applied the first 4 patches here, but really, I shouldn't have had
> to bisect down to the offending patch.
>
> ugh.
>
> greg k-h
>
> In the set I submitted was the patch to remove usage of per channel state in
> netvsc.
> KY dropped it, because it already is in net-next. So this patch can wait until
> net-next is merged.
> The current split tree process is a pain and causes slow development cycles
Greg,
Sorry for the confusion; I will be resending the rest of the patches.
Thanks,
K. Y
Powered by blists - more mailing lists