lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:31:23 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Derek Robson <robsonde@...il.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/25] Staging: rtl8192u: ieee80211: rtl819x_HT.h - style
 fix

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:57:28PM +1300, Derek Robson wrote:
> Fixed style of block comments
> Found using checkpatch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Derek Robson <robsonde@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h | 69 +++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
> index c3aabbaac7ae..307ab45f528d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
> @@ -86,38 +86,38 @@ typedef enum _CHNLOP{
>  		((_pHTInfo)->ChnlOp > CHNLOP_NONE) ? TRUE : FALSE
>  
>  /*
> -typedef	union _HT_CAPABILITY{
> -	u16	ShortData;
> -	u8	CharData[2];
> -	struct
> -	{
> -		u16	AdvCoding:1;
> -		u16	ChlWidth:1;
> -		u16	MimoPwrSave:2;
> -		u16	GreenField:1;
> -		u16	ShortGI20Mhz:1;
> -		u16	ShortGI40Mhz:1;
> -		u16	STBC:1;
> -		u16	BeamForm:1;
> -		u16	DelayBA:1;
> -		u16	MaxAMSDUSize:1;
> -		u16	DssCCk:1;
> -		u16	PSMP:1;
> -		u16	Rsvd:3;
> -	}Field;
> -}HT_CAPABILITY, *PHT_CAPABILITY;
> -
> -typedef	union _HT_CAPABILITY_MACPARA{
> -	u8	ShortData;
> -	u8	CharData[1];
> -	struct
> -	{
> -		u8	MaxRxAMPDU:2;
> -		u8	MPDUDensity:2;
> -		u8	Rsvd:4;
> -	}Field;
> -}HT_CAPABILITY_MACPARA, *PHT_CAPABILITY_MACPARA;
> -*/
> + * typedef	union _HT_CAPABILITY{
> + *	u16	ShortData;
> + *	u8	CharData[2];
> + *	struct
> + *	{
> + *		u16	AdvCoding:1;
> + *		u16	ChlWidth:1;
> + *		u16	MimoPwrSave:2;
> + *		u16	GreenField:1;
> + *		u16	ShortGI20Mhz:1;
> + *		u16	ShortGI40Mhz:1;
> + *		u16	STBC:1;
> + *		u16	BeamForm:1;
> + *		u16	DelayBA:1;
> + *		u16	MaxAMSDUSize:1;
> + *		u16	DssCCk:1;
> + *		u16	PSMP:1;
> + *		u16	Rsvd:3;
> + *	}Field;
> + * }HT_CAPABILITY, *PHT_CAPABILITY;
> + *
> + * typedef	union _HT_CAPABILITY_MACPARA{
> + *	u8	ShortData;
> + *	u8	CharData[1];
> + *	struct
> + *	{
> + *		u8	MaxRxAMPDU:2;
> + *		u8	MPDUDensity:2;
> + *		u8	Rsvd:4;
> + *	}Field;
> + * }HT_CAPABILITY_MACPARA, *PHT_CAPABILITY_MACPARA;
> + */
>  
>  typedef enum _HT_ACTION{
>  	ACT_RECOMMAND_WIDTH		= 0,

I'll take this, but shouldn't we just delete these structures that are
commented out?  Same goes for other patches in this series.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists