[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170213055535.GI16086@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:55:36 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, koverstreet@...gle.com,
neilb@...e.de, nab@...ux-iscsi.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
oleg@...hat.com, asias@...hat.com, shli@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] llist: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist
API
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:38:36PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Byungchul,
>
> Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com> writes:
>
> > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 15 ++-------------
> > drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +---
> > drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 9 ++-------
> > fs/file_table.c | 12 +++++-------
> > fs/namespace.c | 12 +++++-------
> > include/linux/llist.h | 3 +++
> > kernel/irq_work.c | 6 +-----
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 13 ++-----------
> > mm/vmalloc.c | 8 +++-----
>
> I think you need to split the patch. One for each subsystem, this makes
> it easier to be reviewed and merged.
Thank you. I will do it.
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
> [snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists