[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0401MB25847A37C6EED9A531A51F36F4590@DB6PR0401MB2584.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 06:59:49 +0000
From: Alison Wang <alison.wang@....com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Alison Wang <b18965@...escale.com>,
"cyrille.pitchen@...el.com" <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A
Hi, Boris,
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 +0000
> Alison Wang <alison.wang@....com> wrote:
>
> > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available
> on
> > > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added.
> > > >>
> > > >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does
> > > >> ARCH_LAYERSCAPE not cover LS1021 ?
> > > > [Alison Wang] LS1021A is an earlier product and is not compatible
> > > with later Layerscape architecture. So ARCH_LAYERSCAPE can't cover
> > > LS1021A.
> > >
> > > Ah ok, I see. That information would be useful in the commit
> message
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > [Alison Wang] Ok. :)
>
> Would you mind sending a v3 with the updated commit message?
>
[Alison Wang] I will send the v3 patches at once. :)
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists