linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: introduce weak variant of kprobe_exceptions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170213083250.GE7674@naverao1-tp.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:02:50 +0530
From:   "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     mhiramat@...nel.org, ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: introduce weak variant of
 kprobe_exceptions_notify

On 2017/02/10 02:41PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > kprobe_exceptions_notify() is not used on some of the architectures such
> > as arm[64] and powerpc anymore. Introduce a weak variant for such
> > architectures.
> 
> I'll merge patch 1 & 3 via the powerpc tree for v4.11.
> 
> You can then send patch 2 to the arm guys after -rc1, or for 4.12.

Sure, thanks!

- Naveen