[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j0eC3=CPkP6NOMkTpcuik3Ln-D4cj6Nhz50H-srjkbAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:35:00 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix devm_memremap_pages() mem hotplug locking
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Masayoshi Mizuma
<m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:34:11 -0800 Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>> Ben notes that commit f931ab479dd2 "mm: fix devm_memremap_pages crash,
>> use mem_hotplug_{begin, done}" is incomplete and broken. Writes to
>> mem_hotplug.active_writer need to be coordinated under the device
>> hotplug lock. Otherwise, we can potentially corrupt mem_hotplug.refcount
>> leading to soft lockups.
>
>
> I think mem_hotplug_{begin,done} is not suitable to exclude
> devm_memremap_pages()
> because it seems that memory hotplug is not related to this context.
> How about using pgmap_lock instead?
The problem with that switch is the race in
kernel_physical_mapping_init(), see commit f931ab479dd2. As far as I
can see we need all paths that call kernel_physical_mapping_init() to
agree on the same lock, and can't use a private lock in
devm_memremap_pages().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists