[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170213085803.GW1754@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:58:03 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: wm831x: Add device tree binding document
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:31:58AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > This is just a very simple initial binding, supporting only registering
> > the chip and the GPIOs. More features will be added as support for
> > device tree in the driver is expanded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/wm831x.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/wm831x.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/wm831x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/wm831x.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..9771022
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/wm831x.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > +Cirrus Logic/Wolfson Microelectronics wm831x PMICs
> > +
> > +System PMICs with a wide range of additional features.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +
> > + - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> > + "wlf,wm8310"
> > + "wlf,wm8311"
> > + "wlf,wm8312"
> > + "wlf,wm8320"
> > + "wlf,wm8321"
> > + "wlf,wm8325"
> > + "wlf,wm8326"
> > +
> > + - reg : I2C slave address when connected using I2C, chip select number when
> > + using SPI.
> > +
> > + - gpio-controller : Indicates this device is a GPIO controller.
> > + - #gpio-cells : Must be 2. The first cell is the pin number and the
> > + second cell is used to specify optional parameters (currently unused).
>
> Will it ever be used?
>
Hopefully, it is used on some hardware that we supply which I am hoping to
upstream support for shortly.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists