linux-kernel - Re: IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4094dc04-bb2c-a74e-8d4d-8879ac4e7761@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:12:51 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its
 implementation in hfi1_user_sdma_process_request()

>> Thanks for the patch, but this one is already taken care of along
>> with other similar uses of kmalloc/copy:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=148656088729538&w=2
>>
> 
> Michael's patch doesn't change user_sdma_free_request() so it introduces
> a kfreeing an error pointer bug.

Did you notice that another local variable “tmp” was introduced in the update step
“[PATCH 27/27] IB/hfi1: Code reuse with memdup_copy” so that
the mentioned function will usually get a null pointer after a failure there?

Regards,
Markus