lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgSJRv6XGKvysbw+cXYyVUEcNyGv=6tYSWsvOn42dX5f1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:08:36 +0530
From:   Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willy WOLFF <willy.mh.wolff@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: exynos: Use thermal fuse value for thermal zone
 0 on Exynos5420

Hi Krzysztof,



On 12 February 2017 at 01:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> In Odroid XU3 Lite board, the temperature levels reported for thermal
> zone 0 were weird. In warm room:
>         /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp:32000
>         /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp:51000
>         /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone2/temp:55000
>         /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone3/temp:54000
>         /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone4/temp:51000
>
> Sometimes after booting the value was even equal to ambient temperature
> which is highly unlikely to be a real temperature of sensor in SoC.
>
> The thermal sensor's calibration (trimming) is based on fused values.
> In case of the board above, the fused values are: 35, 52, 43, 58 and 43
> (corresponding to each TMU device).  However driver defined a minimum value
> for fused data as 40 and for smaller values it was using a hard-coded 55
> instead.  This lead to mapping data from sensor to wrong temperatures
> for thermal zone 0.
>
> Various vendor 3.10 trees (Hardkernel's based on Samsung LSI, Artik 10)
> do not impose any limits on fused values.  Since we do not have any
> knowledge about these limits, use 0 as a minimum accepted fused value.
> This should essentially allow accepting any reasonable fused value thus
> behaving like vendor driver.
>

On HK following values are define in drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c

#define EFUSE_MIN_VALUE                         40
#define EFUSE_MAX_VALUE                         100

> The exynos5420-tmu-sensor-conf.dtsi is copied directly from existing
> exynso4412 with one change - the samsung,tmu_min_efuse_value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>
> ---

Best Regards
-Anand

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ