[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170213115314.GA16933@amd>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:53:14 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: lkml@...garu.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: 4.10-rc1: thinkpad x60: who ate my cpu?
On Mon 2017-02-13 04:18:51, lkml@...garu.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > > while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
> > > >
> > > > ...crashes x60 with 4.10-rc in few minutes. [Which is bad -- it should
> > > > not die, but also good -- this is easier to reproduce then running 100
> > > > suspend cycles.]
> > >
> > > Can you tell where it crashes?
> >
> > I did not expect a crash, so I was in X... I have a feeling that this
> > will be reproducible on a lot of hardware, but let me try.
>
> FYI: Lockup reproduced with 4.10.0-rc7 with an X61s.
>
> Caught a glimpse of something about an RCU stall timeout before the system shut
> off. Prior to that, during the loop execution, a bunch of systemd processes
> were experiencing watchdog timeouts, and procps `top` would start but
> never refresh, leaving the CPU column all "nan".
Hmm. I was not able to reproduce the lockup when I was running "while
true" over ssh. Some weird stuff happened when I suspended machine
with that loop running, but... I guess that was expected.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists