linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 60/60] perf/core: Fix crash in perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170213130341.564402749@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:04:32 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, eranian@...gle.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 60/60] perf/core: Fix crash in perf_event_read()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

commit 451d24d1e5f40bad000fa9abe36ddb16fc9928cb upstream.

Alexei had his box explode because doing read() on a package
(rapl/uncore) event that isn't currently scheduled in ends up doing an
out-of-bounds load.

Rework the code to more explicitly deal with event->oncpu being -1.

Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Tested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Tested-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: eranian@...gle.com
Fixes: d6a2f9035bfc ("perf/core: Introduce PMU_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170131102710.GL6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/events/core.c |   25 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3461,14 +3461,15 @@ struct perf_read_data {
 	int ret;
 };
 
-static int find_cpu_to_read(struct perf_event *event, int local_cpu)
+static int __perf_event_read_cpu(struct perf_event *event, int event_cpu)
 {
-	int event_cpu = event->oncpu;
 	u16 local_pkg, event_pkg;
 
 	if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG) {
-		event_pkg =  topology_physical_package_id(event_cpu);
-		local_pkg =  topology_physical_package_id(local_cpu);
+		int local_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+		event_pkg = topology_physical_package_id(event_cpu);
+		local_pkg = topology_physical_package_id(local_cpu);
 
 		if (event_pkg == local_pkg)
 			return local_cpu;
@@ -3598,7 +3599,7 @@ u64 perf_event_read_local(struct perf_ev
 
 static int perf_event_read(struct perf_event *event, bool group)
 {
-	int ret = 0, cpu_to_read, local_cpu;
+	int event_cpu, ret = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * If event is enabled and currently active on a CPU, update the
@@ -3611,21 +3612,25 @@ static int perf_event_read(struct perf_e
 			.ret = 0,
 		};
 
-		local_cpu = get_cpu();
-		cpu_to_read = find_cpu_to_read(event, local_cpu);
-		put_cpu();
+		event_cpu = READ_ONCE(event->oncpu);
+		if ((unsigned)event_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+			return 0;
+
+		preempt_disable();
+		event_cpu = __perf_event_read_cpu(event, event_cpu);
 
 		/*
 		 * Purposely ignore the smp_call_function_single() return
 		 * value.
 		 *
-		 * If event->oncpu isn't a valid CPU it means the event got
+		 * If event_cpu isn't a valid CPU it means the event got
 		 * scheduled out and that will have updated the event count.
 		 *
 		 * Therefore, either way, we'll have an up-to-date event count
 		 * after this.
 		 */
-		(void)smp_call_function_single(cpu_to_read, __perf_event_read, &data, 1);
+		(void)smp_call_function_single(event_cpu, __perf_event_read, &data, 1);
+		preempt_enable();
 		ret = data.ret;
 	} else if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE) {
 		struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;