linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 58/60] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170213130341.300838414@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:04:30 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 58/60] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior (again)

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>

commit a1c9f97f0b64e6337d9cfcc08c134450934fdd90 upstream.

Commit 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field
interface") changed list_add() to perf_hpp__register_sort_field().

This resulted in a behavior change since the field was added to the tail
instead of the head.  So the -o option is mostly ignored due to its
order in the list.

This patch fixes it by adding perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field().

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Fixes: 21e6d8428664 ("perf diff: Use perf_hpp__register_sort_field interface")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118051457.30946-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 tools/perf/builtin-diff.c |    2 +-
 tools/perf/ui/hist.c      |    6 ++++++
 tools/perf/util/hist.h    |    7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static int ui_init(void)
 		BUG_ON(1);
 	}
 
-	perf_hpp__register_sort_field(fmt);
+	perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(fmt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -521,6 +521,12 @@ void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(
 	list_add_tail(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
 }
 
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+				       struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+	list_add(&format->sort_list, &list->sorts);
+}
+
 void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
 {
 	list_del(&format->list);
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ void perf_hpp_list__column_register(stru
 				    struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
 void perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
 					struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
+void perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list,
+				       struct perf_hpp_fmt *format);
 
 static inline void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
 {
@@ -293,6 +295,11 @@ static inline void perf_hpp__register_so
 	perf_hpp_list__register_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
 }
 
+static inline void perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
+{
+	perf_hpp_list__prepend_sort_field(&perf_hpp_list, format);
+}
+
 #define perf_hpp_list__for_each_format(_list, format) \
 	list_for_each_entry(format, &(_list)->fields, list)