linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 17/60] cpumask: use nr_cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170213130335.463594769@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:03:49 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@...mix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 17/60] cpumask: use nr_cpumask_bits for parsing functions

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

commit 4d59b6ccf000862beed6fc0765d3209f98a8d8a2 upstream.

Commit 513e3d2d11c9 ("cpumask: always use nr_cpu_ids in formatting and
parsing functions") converted both cpumask printing and parsing
functions to use nr_cpu_ids instead of nr_cpumask_bits.  While this was
okay for the printing functions as it just picked one of the two output
formats that we were alternating between depending on a kernel config,
doing the same for parsing wasn't okay.

nr_cpumask_bits can be either nr_cpu_ids or NR_CPUS.  We can always use
nr_cpu_ids but that is a variable while NR_CPUS is a constant, so it can
be more efficient to use NR_CPUS when we can get away with it.
Converting the printing functions to nr_cpu_ids makes sense because it
affects how the masks get presented to userspace and doesn't break
anything; however, using nr_cpu_ids for parsing functions can
incorrectly leave the higher bits uninitialized while reading in these
masks from userland.  As all testing and comparison functions use
nr_cpumask_bits which can be larger than nr_cpu_ids, the parsed cpumasks
can erroneously yield false negative results.

This made the taskstats interface incorrectly return -EINVAL even when
the inputs were correct.

Fix it by restoring the parse functions to use nr_cpumask_bits instead
of nr_cpu_ids.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170206182442.GB31078@htj.duckdns.org
Fixes: 513e3d2d11c9 ("cpumask: always use nr_cpu_ids in formatting and parsing functions")
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@...mix.de>
Debugged-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/cpumask.h |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_copy(struct c
 static inline int cpumask_parse_user(const char __user *buf, int len,
 				     struct cpumask *dstp)
 {
-	return bitmap_parse_user(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpu_ids);
+	return bitmap_parse_user(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpumask_bits);
 }

 /**
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_parselist_user
 				     struct cpumask *dstp)
 {
 	return bitmap_parselist_user(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp),
-				     nr_cpu_ids);
+				     nr_cpumask_bits);
 }

 /**
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_parse(const ch
 	char *nl = strchr(buf, '\n');
 	unsigned int len = nl ? (unsigned int)(nl - buf) : strlen(buf);

-	return bitmap_parse(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpu_ids);
+	return bitmap_parse(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpumask_bits);
 }

 /**
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_parse(const ch
  */
 static inline int cpulist_parse(const char *buf, struct cpumask *dstp)
 {
-	return bitmap_parselist(buf, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpu_ids);
+	return bitmap_parselist(buf, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpumask_bits);
 }

 /**