lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170213134822.GC22818@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:48:22 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc:     Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] md/raid1: use bio_clone_bioset_partial() in case
 of write behind

> +		struct bio *mbio = NULL;
> +		int offset;
>  		if (!r1_bio->bios[i])
>  			continue;
>  
> -		mbio = bio_clone_mddev(bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
> -		bio_trim(mbio, r1_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
> -			 max_sectors);
> +		offset = r1_bio->sector - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;

I think offset should be a sector_t.

Otherwise this looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ