[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170213033455.GG8498@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:04:55 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:241:15: error: redefinition of
'dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency'
On 13-02-17, 11:35, Philip Li wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:43:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 13-02-17, 03:35, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > head: 1ce42845f987e92eabfc6e026d44d826c25c74a5
> > > commit: 655c9df961751ce21466f6e97e8033932c27a675 PM / OPP: Introduce dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency()
> > > date: 1 year ago
> >
> > And we are seeing these bogus reports again :(
> thanks for feedback, do you mean this is a wrongly reported issue, like the issue can't
> be reproduced or the issue was fixed already?
Look at the date of the patch above: "1 year ago".
I have also received 7-8 more mails for the OPP framework and they are all bogus
as well.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists