linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 RFC] mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range for poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170214094724.GB15721@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:47:24 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Cc:     Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RFC] mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range for
 poll_timout

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:13:42AM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is
> 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us
> to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic
> context sleeping should be no issue and there is no reasons for the
> tight-loop here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>