[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d1elm5uu.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:20:09 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca, oohall@...il.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ast@...nel.org,
chris@...troguy.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, anton@...ba.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, christophe.leroy@....fr, duwe@....de,
oss@...error.net, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc: Emulation support for load/store instructions on LE
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> emulate_step() uses a number of underlying kernel functions that were
> initially not enabled for LE. This has been rectified since.
When exactly? ie. which commit.
Should we backport this? ie. is it actually a bug people are hitting in
the real world much?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists