lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170214111715.GC18546@krava>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:17:15 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf: add cpu__max_present_cpu()

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 04:34:34PM +0100, Jan Stancek wrote:
> Similar to cpu__max_cpu() (which returns max possible CPU),
> returns max present CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> index 2c0b52264a46..8c7504939113 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include "asm/bug.h"
>  
>  static int max_cpu_num;
> +static int max_present_cpu_num;

I think it'd be less confusing for me if we follow the kernel names here

 static int max_cpu_possible;
 static int max_cpu_present;

also I wonder we should use 

 static int max_cpu_online;

instead of:

 sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)

but we can do it all later on as follow up

jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ