lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4560059-002a-0aa7-0d42-8e293b43033d@fb.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:31:28 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:     Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] md: use bio_clone_fast()

On 02/14/2017 08:28 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patches replaces bio_clone() with bio_fast_clone() in
> bio_clone_mddev() because:
> 
> 1) bio_clone_mddev() is used in raid normal I/O and isn't in
> resync I/O path, and all the direct access to bvec table in
> raid happens on resync I/O only except for write behind of raid1.
> Write behind is treated specially, so the replacement is safe.
> 
> 2) for write behind, bio_clone() is kept, but this patchset
> introduces bio_clone_bioset_partial() to just clone one specific 
> bvecs range instead of whole table. Then write behind is improved
> too.

You can add my reviewed-by to the first patch. Shaohua, I'm fine
with you carrying this in the md tree, that would be the easiest
way forward.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ