[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5ee6568-22fb-8829-524a-66d4d89b6325@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:11:40 +0300
From: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] x86/mm: check in_compat_syscall() instead
TIF_ADDR32 for mmap(MAP_32BIT)
On 02/11/2017 11:13 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>
>> At this momet, logic in arch_get_unmapped_area{,_topdown} for mmaps with
>> MAP_32BIT flag checks TIF_ADDR32 which means:
>> o if 32-bit ELF changes mode to 64-bit on x86_64 and then tries to
>> mmap() with MAP_32BIT it'll result in addr over 4Gb (as default is
>> top-down allocation)
>> o if 64-bit ELF changes mode to 32-bit and tries mmap() with MAP_32BIT,
>> it'll allocate only memory in 1GB space: [0x40000000, 0x80000000).
>>
>> Fix it by handeling MAP_32BIT in 64-bit syscalls only.
>
> I really have a hard time to understand what is fixed and how that is
> related to the $subject.
>
> Again. Please explain the problem first properly so one can understand the
> issue immediately.
Ok, rewrote the changes log.
>
>> As a little bonus it'll make thread flag a little less used.
>
> I really do not understand the bonus part here. You replace the thread flag
> check with a different one and AFAICT this looks like oart of the 'fix'.
It's a part of the fix, right.
What I meant here is that after those patches TIF_ADDR32 is no more
used after exec() time. That's bonus as if we manage to change exec()
code in some way (i.e., pass address restriction as a parameter), we'll
have additional free thread info flag.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, len,
>> static void find_start_end(unsigned long flags, unsigned long *begin,
>> unsigned long *end)
>> {
>> - if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT)) {
>> + if (!in_compat_syscall() && (flags & MAP_32BIT)) {
>> /* This is usually used needed to map code in small
>> model, so it needs to be in the first 31bit. Limit
>> it to that. This means we need to move the
>> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
>> return addr;
>>
>> /* for MAP_32BIT mappings we force the legacy mmap base */
>> - if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT))
>> + if (!in_compat_syscall() && (flags & MAP_32BIT))
>> goto bottomup;
>>
>> /* requesting a specific address */
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
>>
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists