[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170214162013.esm3jznmng545oje@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:20:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove "wp" status line in cpuinfo
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:12:09PM +0100, Mathias Krause wrote:
> As of commit a5c2a893dbd4 ("x86, 386 removal: Remove
> CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK") the kernel won't boot if CR0.WP isn't working
> correctly. This makes a process reading this file always see "wp : yes"
> here -- otherwise there would be no process to begin with ;)
>
> As this status line in /proc/cpuinfo serves no purpose for quite some
> time now, get rid of it.
Right, sure, except /proc/cpuinfo's format is kind of an ABI and scripts
rely on it, I'm being told. TBH, I'd remove that wp:-line too but this
is just me. tip guys' call.
FWIW, for all three:
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists