[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1487091550.2305.32.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:59:10 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, fabio.estevam@....com, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil@...all.nl, nick@...anahar.org, markus.heiser@...marIT.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com, bparrot@...com,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, arnd@...db.de, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com, tiffany.lin@...iatek.com,
jean-christophe.trotin@...com, horms+renesas@...ge.net.au,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
songjun.wu@...rochip.com, andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] media: imx: Add MIPI CSI-2 Receiver subdev
driver
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 15:20 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
[...]
> > It seems the OV5640 driver never puts its the CSI-2 lanes into stop
> > state while not streaming.
>
> Yes I found that as well.
>
> But good news, I finally managed to coax the OV5640's clock lane
> into LP-11 state! It was accomplished by setting bit 5 in OV5640 register
> 0x4800. The datasheet describes this bit as "Gate clock lane when no
> packet to transmit". But I may have also got this to work with the
> additional
> write 1 to bits 4-6 in register 0x3019 ("MIPI CLK/data lane state in sleep
> mode" - setting 1 to these bits selects LP-11 for sleep mode).
>
> So I am now finally able to call csi2_dphy_wait_stopstate() in
> csi2_s_stream(ON).
That's good news.
> So for the TC35874, you shouldn't see a timeout in csi2_s_stream(ON)
> any longer.
>
> I have updated both ov5640.c and imx6-mipi-csi2.c in the wip branch.
> Can you try again? I have not applied your patch below, because I
> don't think that is needed anymore.
Thanks, I'll test tomorrow.
> And speaking of the TC35874, I received this module for the SabreLite
> from Boundary Devices (thanks BD!). So I can finally help you with
> debug/test. Are there any patches you need to send to me (against
> wip branch) for this support, or can I use what exists now in media
> tree? Also any scripts or help with running.
That's even better news. I have pushed my my wip branch, which contains
some colorspace work and experiments to pass through query/g_/s_std
subdev calls so bypassing the pipeline can be avoided. Also, there's the
Nitrogen6X device tree that I've been using to test:
https://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux imx-media-staging-md-wip
> > With the recent s_stream reordering,
> > streaming from TC358743 does not work anymore, since imx6-mipi-csi2
> > s_stream is called before tc358743 s_stream, while all lanes are still
> > in stop state. Then it waits for the clock lane to become active and
> > fails. I have applied the following patch to revert the reordering
> > locally to get it to work again.
> >
> > The initialization order, as Russell pointed out, should be:
> >
> > 1. reset the D-PHY.
> > 2. place MIPI sensor in LP-11 state
> > 3. perform D-PHY initialisation
> > 4. configure CSI2 lanes and de-assert resets and shutdown signals
> >
> > So csi2_s_stream should wait for stop state on all lanes (the result of
> > 2.) before dphy_init (3.), not wait for active clock afterwards. That
> > should happen only after sensor_s_stream was called. So unless we are
> > allowed to reorder steps 1. and 2., we might need the prepare_stream
> > callback after all.
>
> Agreed!
>
> See my new FIXME comment in imx6-mipi-csi2.c.
Looks good. I wonder if enabling the phy clock isn't part of step 3.
though.
> I agree we might need a new subdev op .prepare_stream(). This
> op would be implemented by imx6-mipi-csi2.c, and would carry
> out steps 3, 4, 5 (instead of currently by csi2_s_stream()). Then
> step 6 would finally become available as csi2_s_stream().
>
> And then we must re-order stream on to start sensor first, then
> csi2, as in your patch below.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists