linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members of struct cpuinfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:21:56 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
        Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members of struct cpuinfo_x86

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:56:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> That's because

No, what Mathias said.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.