[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2278259.j1SsZdfySc@avalon>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:14:08 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, sre@...nel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/13] smiapp-pll: Take existing divisor into account in minimum divisor check
Hi Sakari,
On Wednesday 15 Feb 2017 00:05:03 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:40:04PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
> >
> > Required added multiplier (and divisor) calculation did not take into
> > account the existing divisor when checking the values against the
> > minimum divisor. Do just that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
> > Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>
> I need to understand again why did I write this patch. :-)
I was about to mention that a more detailed commit message (or possibly event
comments in the source code) would be good :-)
> Could you send me the smiapp driver output with debug level messages
> enabled, please?
>
> I think the problem was with the secondary sensor.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp-pll.c
> > b/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp-pll.c
> > index 771db56..166bbaf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp-pll.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> > * General Public License for more details.
> > */
> >
> > +#define DEBUG
> > +
This should be removed.
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > #include <linux/gcd.h>
> > #include <linux/lcm.h>
> > @@ -227,7 +229,8 @@ static int __smiapp_pll_calculate(
> > more_mul_factor = lcm(div, pll->pre_pll_clk_div) / div;
> > dev_dbg(dev, "more_mul_factor: %u\n", more_mul_factor);
> >
> > - more_mul_factor = lcm(more_mul_factor, op_limits->min_sys_clk_div);
> > + more_mul_factor = lcm(more_mul_factor,
> > + DIV_ROUND_UP(op_limits->min_sys_clk_div, div));
> > dev_dbg(dev, "more_mul_factor: min_op_sys_clk_div: %d\n",
> > more_mul_factor);
> > i = roundup(more_mul_min, more_mul_factor);
> > @@ -456,6 +459,10 @@ int smiapp_pll_calculate(struct device *dev,
> > i = gcd(pll->pll_op_clk_freq_hz, pll->ext_clk_freq_hz);
> > mul = div_u64(pll->pll_op_clk_freq_hz, i);
> > div = pll->ext_clk_freq_hz / i;
> > + if (!mul) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "forcing mul to 1\n");
> > + mul = 1;
> > + }
> > dev_dbg(dev, "mul %u / div %u\n", mul, div);
> >
> > min_pre_pll_clk_div =
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists