[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1487198500.256380999@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:41:40 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@...e.com>,
"Steffen Maier" <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Benjamin Block" <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 013/306] zfcp: trace on request for open and close of
WKA port
3.16.40-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit d27a7cb91960cf1fdd11b10071e601828cbf4b1f upstream.
Since commit a54ca0f62f953898b05549391ac2a8a4dad6482b
("[SCSI] zfcp: Redesign of the debug tracing for HBA records.")
HBA records no longer contain WWPN, D_ID, or LUN
to reduce duplicate information which is already in REC records.
In contrast to "regular" target ports, we don't use recovery to open
WKA ports such as directory/nameserver, so we don't get REC records.
Therefore, introduce pseudo REC running records without any
actual recovery action but including D_ID of WKA port on open/close.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: a54ca0f62f95 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Redesign of the debug tracing for HBA records.")
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 8 ++++++--
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
@@ -321,6 +321,38 @@ void zfcp_dbf_rec_run(char *tag, struct
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dbf->rec_lock, flags);
}
+/**
+ * zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka - trace wka port event with info like running recovery
+ * @tag: identifier for event
+ * @wka_port: well known address port
+ * @req_id: request ID to correlate with potential HBA trace record
+ */
+void zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka(char *tag, struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port,
+ u64 req_id)
+{
+ struct zfcp_dbf *dbf = wka_port->adapter->dbf;
+ struct zfcp_dbf_rec *rec = &dbf->rec_buf;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dbf->rec_lock, flags);
+ memset(rec, 0, sizeof(*rec));
+
+ rec->id = ZFCP_DBF_REC_RUN;
+ memcpy(rec->tag, tag, ZFCP_DBF_TAG_LEN);
+ rec->port_status = wka_port->status;
+ rec->d_id = wka_port->d_id;
+ rec->lun = ZFCP_DBF_INVALID_LUN;
+
+ rec->u.run.fsf_req_id = req_id;
+ rec->u.run.rec_status = ~0;
+ rec->u.run.rec_step = ~0;
+ rec->u.run.rec_action = ~0;
+ rec->u.run.rec_count = ~0;
+
+ debug_event(dbf->rec, 1, rec, sizeof(*rec));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dbf->rec_lock, flags);
+}
+
static inline
void zfcp_dbf_san(char *tag, struct zfcp_dbf *dbf, void *data, u8 id, u16 len,
u64 req_id, u32 d_id)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern void zfcp_dbf_adapter_unregister(
extern void zfcp_dbf_rec_trig(char *, struct zfcp_adapter *,
struct zfcp_port *, struct scsi_device *, u8, u8);
extern void zfcp_dbf_rec_run(char *, struct zfcp_erp_action *);
+extern void zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka(char *, struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *, u64);
extern void zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_uss(char *, struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
extern void zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_res(char *, int, struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
extern void zfcp_dbf_hba_bit_err(char *, struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
@@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ out:
int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port)
{
struct zfcp_qdio *qdio = wka_port->adapter->qdio;
- struct zfcp_fsf_req *req;
+ struct zfcp_fsf_req *req = NULL;
int retval = -EIO;
spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
@@ -1611,6 +1611,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_f
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
+ if (req && !IS_ERR(req))
+ zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fsowp_1", wka_port, req->req_id);
return retval;
}
@@ -1635,7 +1637,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port_hand
int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port)
{
struct zfcp_qdio *qdio = wka_port->adapter->qdio;
- struct zfcp_fsf_req *req;
+ struct zfcp_fsf_req *req = NULL;
int retval = -EIO;
spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
@@ -1664,6 +1666,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
+ if (req && !IS_ERR(req))
+ zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fscwp_1", wka_port, req->req_id);
return retval;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists