[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1487198500.518921224@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:41:40 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@...filter.org>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"Laura Garcia Liebana" <nevola@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 174/306] netfilter: nf_tables: fix type mismatch with
error return from nft_parse_u32_check
3.16.40-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
commit f1d505bb762e30bf316ff5d3b604914649d6aed3 upstream.
Commit 36b701fae12ac ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate maximum value of
u32 netlink attributes") introduced nft_parse_u32_check with a return
value of "unsigned int", yet on error it returns "-ERANGE".
This patch corrects the mismatch by changing the return value to "int",
which happens to match the actual users of nft_parse_u32_check already.
Found by Coverity, CID 1373930.
Note that commit 21a9e0f1568ea ("netfilter: nft_exthdr: fix error
handling in nft_exthdr_init()) attempted to address the issue, but
did not address the return type of nft_parse_u32_check.
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: Laura Garcia Liebana <nevola@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Fixes: 36b701fae12ac ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate maximum value...")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static inline enum nft_registers nft_typ
return type == NFT_DATA_VERDICT ? NFT_REG_VERDICT : NFT_REG_1;
}
-unsigned int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int max, u32 *dest);
+int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int max, u32 *dest);
int nft_validate_input_register(enum nft_registers reg);
int nft_validate_output_register(enum nft_registers reg);
int nft_validate_data_load(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, enum nft_registers reg,
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -3723,7 +3723,7 @@ static int nf_tables_check_loops(const s
* Otherwise a 0 is returned and the attribute value is stored in the
* destination variable.
*/
-unsigned int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int max, u32 *dest)
+int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int max, u32 *dest)
{
u32 val;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists