[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170215044444.GA1834@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:44:44 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in next with use printk_safe buffers in printk
On (02/14/17 09:03), Tony Lindgren wrote:
[..]
> > Do not call printk() from tk_debug_account_sleep_time(), because
> > tk_debug_account_sleep_time() is called under tk_core seq lock.
> > It's not safe to call printk() under tk_core, because console_sem
> > invokes scheduled (via wake_up_process()->activate_task()), which,
> > in turn, can call timekeeping code again, for instance, via
> > get_time()->ktime_get(). This may result in infinite loop on
> > tk_core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>
> Thanks yeah this fixes the issue for me:
>
> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists