[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170215052229.GR16086@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:22:29 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...il.com,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary condition in
push_dl_task()
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:11:51PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Once pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq) return a task, it guarantees that
> the task's cpu is rq->cpu, so task_cpu(next_task) is always rq->cpu if
> task == next_task. Remove a redundant condition and make code simpler.
Furthermore, unnecessary one branch and unnecessary two LOAD operations
in 'if' statement can be avoided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 27737f3..ad8d577 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1483,7 +1483,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
> * then possible that next_task has migrated.
> */
> task = pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq);
> - if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
> + if (task == next_task) {
> /*
> * The task is still there. We don't try
> * again, some other cpu will pull it when ready.
> --
> 1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists