| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cd0b0197-4d5a-bef3-b4a4-69f5ad12f01c@sonymobile.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:22:10 +0100
From: peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<arve@...roid.com>, <riandrews@...roid.com>,
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 staging-next] android: Collect statistics from
lowmemorykiller
On 02/14/2017 05:50 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:09:30PM +0100, peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com wrote:
>> From: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com>
>>
>> This collects stats for shrinker calls and how much
>> waste work we do within the lowmemorykiller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/android/Kconfig | 11 ++++
>> drivers/staging/android/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 9 ++-
>> drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.h | 29 +++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig
>> index 6c00d6f..96e86c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/Kconfig
>> @@ -24,6 +24,17 @@ config ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER
>> scripts (/init.rc), and it defines priority values with minimum free memory size
>> for each priority.
>>
>> +config ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER_STATS
>> + bool "Android Low Memory Killer: collect statistics"
>> + depends on ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER
>> + default n
>> + help
>> + Create a file in /proc/lmkstats that includes
>> + collected statistics about kills, scans and counts
>> + and interaction with the shrinker. Its content
>> + will be different depeding on lmk implementation used.
> Ick, no new /proc files please, this isn't a "process" value. What's
> wrong with debugfs?
This is intended for android. Android users are very limited in their access
to linux part of the system on commercial models and lmk activity has a bad impact on the performance
of the device. Even the application developers has not much access so it seems to be fair to give
the users the information about why there is a problem.
> Also note the minor ' ' usage in your first sentence of the help text.
>
>> source "drivers/staging/android/ion/Kconfig"
>>
>> endif # if ANDROID
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/Makefile b/drivers/staging/android/Makefile
>> index 7ed1be7..d710eb2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/Makefile
>> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-y += ion/
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ASHMEM) += ashmem.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER) += lowmemorykiller.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID_LOW_MEMORY_KILLER_STATS) += lowmemorykiller_stats.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>> index ec3b665..15c1b38 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>> #include <linux/profile.h>
>> #include <linux/notifier.h>
>> +#include "lowmemorykiller_stats.h"
>>
>> static u32 lowmem_debug_level = 1;
>> static short lowmem_adj[6] = {
>> @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_deathpending_timeout;
>> static unsigned long lowmem_count(struct shrinker *s,
>> struct shrink_control *sc)
>> {
>> + lmk_inc_stats(LMK_COUNT);
>> return global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
>> global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
>> global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON) +
>> @@ -95,6 +97,7 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
>> global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM) -
>> total_swapcache_pages();
>>
>> + lmk_inc_stats(LMK_SCAN);
>> if (lowmem_adj_size < array_size)
>> array_size = lowmem_adj_size;
>> if (lowmem_minfree_size < array_size)
>> @@ -134,6 +137,7 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
>> if (task_lmk_waiting(p) &&
>> time_before_eq(jiffies, lowmem_deathpending_timeout)) {
>> task_unlock(p);
>> + lmk_inc_stats(LMK_TIMEOUT);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -179,7 +183,9 @@ static unsigned long lowmem_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
>> other_free * (long)(PAGE_SIZE / 1024));
>> lowmem_deathpending_timeout = jiffies + HZ;
>> rem += selected_tasksize;
>> - }
>> + lmk_inc_stats(LMK_KILL);
>> + } else
>> + lmk_inc_stats(LMK_WASTE);
>>
>> lowmem_print(4, "lowmem_scan %lu, %x, return %lu\n",
>> sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask, rem);
>> @@ -196,6 +202,7 @@ static struct shrinker lowmem_shrinker = {
>> static int __init lowmem_init(void)
>> {
>> register_shrinker(&lowmem_shrinker);
>> + init_procfs_lmk();
>> return 0;
>> }
>> device_initcall(lowmem_init);
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..673691c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
>> +/*
>> + * lowmemorykiller_stats
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +/* This code is bookkeeping of statistical information
>> + * from lowmemorykiller and provide a node in proc "/proc/lmkstats".
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
>> +#include "lowmemorykiller_stats.h"
>> +
>> +struct lmk_stats {
>> + atomic_long_t scans; /* counter as in shrinker scans */
>> + atomic_long_t kills; /* the number of sigkills sent */
>> + atomic_long_t waste; /* the numer of extensive calls that did
>> + * not lead to anything
>> + */
>> + atomic_long_t timeout; /* counter for shrinker calls that needed
>> + * to be cancelled due to pending kills
>> + */
>> + atomic_long_t count; /* number of shrinker count calls */
>> + atomic_long_t unknown; /* internal */
> Why not document the structure in the proper kernel-doc format?
>
> Also, do you really need atomic variables here?
I think so. The lmk are usually called from kswapd0,
but can also be called from other parts. At least for
arm the cost is low so better safe than sorry and
it is better to focus on have the spin_lock held as short
time as possible.
>
>> +} st;
>> +
>> +void lmk_inc_stats(int key)
>> +{
>> + switch (key) {
>> + case LMK_SCAN:
>> + atomic_long_inc(&st.scans);
>> + break;
>> + case LMK_KILL:
>> + atomic_long_inc(&st.kills);
>> + break;
>> + case LMK_WASTE:
>> + atomic_long_inc(&st.waste);
>> + break;
>> + case LMK_TIMEOUT:
>> + atomic_long_inc(&st.timeout);
>> + break;
>> + case LMK_COUNT:
>> + atomic_long_inc(&st.count);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + atomic_long_inc(&st.unknown);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lmk_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>> +{
>> + seq_printf(m, "kill: %ld\n", atomic_long_read(&st.kills));
>> + seq_printf(m, "scan: %ld\n", atomic_long_read(&st.scans));
>> + seq_printf(m, "waste: %ld\n", atomic_long_read(&st.waste));
>> + seq_printf(m, "timeout: %ld\n", atomic_long_read(&st.timeout));
>> + seq_printf(m, "count: %ld\n", atomic_long_read(&st.count));
>> + seq_printf(m, "unknown: %ld (internal)\n",
>> + atomic_long_read(&st.unknown));
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int lmk_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + return single_open(file, lmk_proc_show, PDE_DATA(inode));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct file_operations lmk_proc_fops = {
>> + .open = lmk_proc_open,
>> + .read = seq_read,
>> + .release = single_release
>> +};
>> +
>> +int __init init_procfs_lmk(void)
>> +{
>> + proc_create_data(LMK_PROCFS_NAME, 0444, NULL, &lmk_proc_fops, NULL);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.h b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..abeb6924
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller_stats.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
>> +/*
>> + * lowmemorykiller_stats interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...ymobile.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +enum lmk_kill_stats {
> nit, two spaces?
>
>> + LMK_SCAN = 1,
>> + LMK_KILL = 2,
>> + LMK_WASTE = 3,
>> + LMK_TIMEOUT = 4,
>> + LMK_COUNT = 5
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define LMK_PROCFS_NAME "lmkstats"
> You only use it once, why create a #define? Anyway, debugfs is better
> for debugging stuff like this, that is what it was created for.
>From android selinux:
neverallow untrusted_app debugfs_type:file read;
And the define was created upon requests from internal reviews that prefer to
see this in headers.
I have debugfs patch ongoing, but it's more about the internal structure
for debugging than statistical data from the lmk.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
thanks
/Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists