linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX operation is on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170215131205.GD4020@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:12:05 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event creation if VMX
 operation is on

Em Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:05:10PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin escreveu:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:34:58AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >
> >> Well, we can't make the limitation go away. You'll still have to stop
> >> kvms to get any 'meaningful' PT data.
> >
> > Why would you need to stop all VMs in order to get your !VM data? Sure,
> > you get black holes where the VM runs, but we should be able to see
> > everything else.
> 
> No, what I mean is that if you run kvm prior to starting perf record,
> which I assume is the case for acme, your entire session is a black

Exactly.

> hole. The VMXON happens pretty early on, you can open /dev/kvm,
> ioctl(KVM_CREATE_VM) on it and that will do a VMXON already.
> 
> The problem is that PT (on BDW) doesn't trace inside VM root mode, not
> just between VM entry/VM exit.

Which is just unfortunate, destroys PT for a rather common use case :-\

Guess I need a <fill in the broadwell successor that allows using PT
together with VMs>

Which is?

:-)

- Arnaldo