linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2d3173f5-8818-21cd-eccd-10fc6d5ec3bd@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:05:34 -0600
From:   Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:     Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shankerd@...eaurora.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Neil Leeder <nleeder@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: pl011: Work around QDF2400 E44 stuck BUSY bit

Christopher Covington wrote:
> Nothing needs QDF2400 erratum 44. Software should try to detect the presence
> of the erratum. So I think qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present would
> make sense. But those suffixes don't add substantial value in my opinion.

I'd be okay with qdf2400_e44_detected or qdf2400_e44_present.  I think it's a 
lot clearer.  Another idea is "has_qdf2400_e44".

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.