[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <963c309b-ca3a-e5a7-30f3-e0a521e5c3e5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 23:24:01 +0900
From: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
perf group <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion/Problems] perf annoate: Some problems related to the
source code view and Improvement of it with line numbers
On 02/15/2017 10:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:34:51PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> > Hi all :)
>> >
>> > I found some problems about showing line numbers of perf-annotate.
>> > and I have a suggestion about perf-annotate.
>> >
>> > Sure, I have a plan to send the patchset about that.
>> > But I'd like to know other opinions about that before sending the patchset.
>> > :)
> Humm, TLDR, please try to find one problem, describe it precisely, show
> before and after results (in the changeset message), and send it, rinse,
> repeat.
>
> For instance, if the line numbers are different in --stdio and --tui,
> that is a problem, state that, show the output (as you did below), put
> it in a patch, send it.
>
Okey it was too long.
I'll separate the contents into simple parts
and send a patch with things you said :)
for easy review.
Thanks,
Taeung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists